室内消防188金博网网址多少

我们的服务使用组合分支在我们的软管生产线上，并且已经做了很多年。我一直对关于光孔v组合的讨论很感兴趣，并阅读了一些文章和观看了一些关于区别的培训视频。显然，固体流有许多优势，特别是对于直接开火攻击。由于我没有使用这种类型的喷嘴的实际经验(除了把组合在一个直的水流中不时)，我有一个恼人的问题，它是否适合内部消防。188金博网网址多少当火灾通过头顶的气体(对流)从房间移动到建筑内部的其他区域时，消防队员经常不得不处理这些过热的气体。经常会出现“翻车”的情况，这使得进入火场很危险，并且闪燃迫在眉睫。在我们的组合分支中，我们将喷雾模式设置在30度左右，并通过控制应用(不要太多的水，以免过度干扰热层造成过多的蒸汽)来冷却上方和前方的气体。水雾中的小水滴在转化为蒸汽时吸收了大量的热量(此时水吸收的热量最多)。水一般不会与结构本身接触，而只是与气体接触。我经常在现场消防培训和工作中这样做，它的效果是把火焰追回房间。 Advancement can then be made to the fire room, where a direct attack with narrow spray can be made to extinguish the fire. This scenario most often occurs in hallways while moving down to the fire room in a house or apartment block. I can not imagine the smooth bore nozzle effectively achieving dealing with overhead rollover, although I'm sure it does. I'm interested to know how those of you with smooth bores deal with this situation. Are there any videos that demonstrate this, and do you think that the solid stream is as effective on overhead gas cooling? I'm not for one second doubting their effectiveness in these situations, but just have no experience with them and am very interested in finding out.

问候

迈克尔D