救援Question

Replies to This Discussion

PermalinkReply byJeffrey PostonJanuary 24, 2012 at 2:55pm

I say, "Maybe", as always, constant size up and victim surivability profile is performed, The operations level training covers the meters and papers that give the information allowing the rescuers to proceede or retreat.

An ops level member who is competent in meters, and understanding and interpreting data and events should be expected to enter a hot zone to perform rescue, even in structural gear so long as the there is no extreme acid/base gas in the air (use some pH paper), LEL is monitored (and action levels understood), as well as F and KI papers where applicable. The meter of choice should be a 5 gas and as always, all PPE should be worn.

Memebers should be trained to package without getting dirty, and trained to properly doff PPE should they become contaminated. Emergency decon should be implemented as well.

There are a lot of moving parts to this individual, so I think the answer is yes, but is it for everyone? Probably not.

• ▶Reply

PermalinkReply byJeffrey PostonJanuary 24, 2012 at 4:13pm

Also, the availability of the equipment I mentioned, if it isn't there, then the moves of the rescuers are extremely limited.

• ▶Reply

PermalinkReply byBill SchneideronJanuary 26, 2012 at 7:23am

I think in this day and age of HazMat that there needs to be a more effort on product I.D. and our reality of making a Save before we say "Go or No Go". Chemical, Biological, Nuclear, Radioactive, and WMD (Bomb) can all be classified as a HazMat. We can all create a "Doomsday" tabletop scenario to give our crews. Hollywood has made big money doing just that with the impending 2012 disaster that we are all supposed to be ready for....As a company officer my first thoughts upon arriving on scene are my crews safety--ALWAYS, then the citizens. Sorry taxpayers. If the rescuers need rescuing then I'm not putting my people in harms way.

Our department put this very question to a scenario where a chlorine tanker rolled and had a 1 inch vapor leak with a driver lying on the ground. Half the crews did not enter to perform a Save and the other half did. So who was right?

I put this next question to you the firefighter.

Don't we run into a HazMat every time we fight a fire? We are in "Rescue mode" while the structural elements are being compromised all around us. We don breathing apparatus to make sure our airway is not compromised. We wear protective gear to reduce the effects of heat and falling debris on our bodies. We don't carrry air monitors, ph paper, or sample tubes while dragging in a 1.5" hoseline.

Thanks for the simple question. Hopefully I didn't give a complicated answer.

• ▶Reply

PermalinkReply byJames BopponJanuary 26, 2012 at 12:31pm

Absolutely we send Firefighters into burning structures every day because we give them the correct PPE and training in tactics & strategy to operate safely. We all need to realize the modern fie is a HAZ MAT incident! When was the last time we set up chairs and sat around waiting for a special team before going to work when we arrive at a fire? I don't mean to over simplify however as long as we give operations level FF's the tools and training they need we can perform rescues on many of the most common chemicals we encounter.

• ▶Reply

PermalinkReply by托德·麦基onJanuary 26, 2012 at 3:55pm

These are all great replies!

你能相信烤鸭是违法的吗r the "HOT" zone! We can actually be fined over it! I have the ruling interpretation, I will try to post it here.

Thanks for the input! Join the group called "HAZMAT PLACARDS TO SUCCESS"

• ▶Reply

▶Reply to Discussion